Wow, Everyone is Flipping Out Over Lady Gaga’s “Minimalist” Look While Forgetting to Ask One Important Question

What was she going to do, anyway? Seriously, she wore a dress of steak. STEAK. How do you get to a higher level of being outrageous from that—with a sea shell bra and g-string? No, no, not really. We were all expecting her shock value to climb and climb and climb, forgetting that at a certain point we’d be so used to it that she could walk around naked with an panda glued to her head and we wouldn’t even blink.

And if you’re still not done discussing it, I’d like to take a moment to reflect on this gem:

Lady-Gaga-frog-dress_lAnd this one, just for fun:

tumblr_ky7t52x8Vo1qzh5gno1_400Also, let’s be clear: Face paint is her “minimalist” look. Face paint.

Lady Gaga Sighting In Los Angeles - August 12, 2013

Miley Cyrus Tries Too Hard At the VMAs; Leaves Us All Feeling a Bit Sad and Violated

As much as you probably would rather have a post about the different looks at Sunday’s MTV Video Music Awards, instead, I’m going to spotlight the worst offender of the night. I’m pretty sure we were all left feeling the same watching Miley Cyrus’ performance: depressed, a little horrified and helpless to stop it.

“What are you doing!” goes your inner monologue, as Ms. Cyrus was seemingly unable to contain her tongue inside her mouth. Tip: If Robin Thicke looks bored as your molest him on stage, then you are not pulling off sexy. She was trying way too hard; her “choreography” reeked of desperation and Paris Hilton’s perfume. Below are some of the best/saddest shots of her performance with Robin Thicke. Enjoy.

If This is What 30 Looks Like, It Can’t Be That Bad

Today, Mila Kunis turns 30. And she looks like this. Sunday, I turn 30. Though I won’t wake up looking like the fashion goddess Ms. Kunis is, exiting my 20s is something to look forward to. More on that later. For now—beautiful photos to wind down your Wednesday.

latimes feb11
Los Angeles Times Magazine, February 2011
w mar11
W, March 2011
Harper's Bazaar, April 2012
Harper’s Bazaar, April 2012

The Incredible Advantage of Google Glass in Fashion

nina
Nina Garcia explores Google Glass for NYFW. Photo courtesy Marie Claire

I’ve been going back and forth on this whole Google Glass thing. As much as I love technology, there is a point where it will be too intrusive in our daily lives. But I don’t think Google’s latest contraption is (yet), only because I can see the benefits of what may come from it for the fashion industry. Marie Claire Creative Director Nina Garcia plans to wear it during New York Fashion Week come fall, and it’s going to be extraordinary. That might seem like too grand of a word, but think about it: We’ll be sitting front row with Garcia during the biggest fashion event of the year. Most of us would have to work for decades to get that seat—not that I’m not going to try—and I’m thrilled that we can have the next-best thing.

And that doesn’t have to be all of it: photo shoots, first looks, interviews, shopping—there are so many glimpses to be had into the lives of the fashion elite.

According to WWD, Garcia’s photos, videos and other fashion week insights will be beamed live across several of Garcia’s and Marie Claire’s social media channels, including Vine, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, and marieclaire.com. Hearst is tagging the event “Be Nina.”

“Usually I have lots of devices during fashion week. Google Glass Expedition is controlled by your voice or a tap of your finger. It’s a very different device than the iPhone. It’s like wearing a little computer,” Garcia said to WWD‘s Rosemary Feitelberg. “It’s a hands-free experience which is kind of liberating. I can go to a show and just be and not be looking down at my iPhone all the time.”

Despite the “liberation,” Garcia did note that the device’s short battery life of one-to-two hours will be hinderance, as fashion week demands closer to a 12-hour workday. Nina problems, right?

Kevin West, Scott Sternberg Discuss the Overlap of Fashion and Food at the (Amazing and Beautiful) Hammer Museum

I’ll just give you my favorite quote by Kevin West from last night discussing his transition from being an editor at W to a successful blogger and photographer: “Writing the blog was how I played hooky from the magazine, and the photography was how I played hooky from writing the blog.” He’s pictured below (left) talking with Scott Sternberg (right), Band of Outsiders founder, about the overlap of fashion and food. The other photos are from around Hammer Museum, which is amazing, and if you haven’t been—you must go!

IMG_0172 IMG_0160 IMG_0165IMG_0167

Penis Jewelry, and Other Fashion Problems on a Monday


Kesha Penis Jewelry
My first thought when I heard about Kesha’s penis-jewelry line? Be serious, Kesha. But, she probably is being serious. This is Kesha serious.

Admittedly, I probably wouldn’t have such a problem with it if it weren’t from Kesha, whom I think is one of the worst things that has happened to music and pop culture since…Kesha? I’m not sure how to end that sentence because there’s not much more I don’t like than her. Feel free to help me out in the comments.

I should also add that the jewelry is selling out online. But I can complain as much as I want, I’m still not selling albums or jewelry like she is. The Cut blog offers some helpful tips on how to wear it (my tip: don’t, unless you’re headed to a bachelorette party).

That’s all though. The headline was a bit misleading, I don’t really have any other fashion problems this morning, besides not knowing what I’m going to wear. Time to pick an outfit.

Fashion Photographer Hannah Ross

Fashion Photographer Hannah Ross

On the hunt for shutterbug’s gold, Photographer Hannah Ross slowly explored the cramped crawl space beneath her subject’s house. With only her cell phone as a light source, she searched for the perfect prop that might complete her photo shoot. Instead, she stumbled across a surprising find: bloody mannequins. At least, they were mannequins painted to look bloody. “[It] was quite creepy and unexpected,” she recounts of the unusual discovery. But for some photographers, unusual tends to be the norm in this business. “I have loads of stories about equipment failures and being stranded in over 100-degree heat, or a model having an allergic reaction and needing a medevac,” Hannah adds. But that’s just another day at the office for someone so dedicated to her craft: No adventure is too outside the box when it comes to getting the perfect shot.

Raised mainly in Virginia, with five years of her childhood spent in Japan and Panama, Hannah decided to head west to work in television and commercials after getting her film degree from New York University. Between the vastly different coasts, she noted disparate aesthetics between each major city.

“When I first moved to L.A., I met with several prominent photographers to learn the ‘rules’ for west coast photography, which are: The market is primarily lifestyle and catalog, and things are very casual. For instance, a bathing suit shot in New York would require heels on the model (high fashion), and in L.A. it would be barefoot. Working with L.A. designers, the styles are also more street/casual with a lot of influence coming from graffiti artists. There isn’t much high fashion found, so I did have to bend a bit to suit the clients,” Hannah explains, revealing how living in Los Angeles influenced her work at the time.

Once she nailed the aesthetic, Hannah focused on crafting a team to work with in L.A.: “It took years, but finding the perfect stylist and makeup artist is essential to any production. The philosophy comes down to — if you have a crew that you truly trust, then you’ll have a natural groove going, and the photos will follow.”

That’s no joke; with the perfect team in place and valuable advice on her side — not to mention raw talent — Hannah has built a successful career, evidenced by a well-stocked and well-deserved trophy case. She was named the 2011 New Master Artist in the New Masters Competition (Netherlands);  was commended at the 2011 Sony World Photography Awards; had her work displayed for the Moscow Biennale at the Moscow Modern Art Museum; was appointed the Arte Creative Residency at ARTE G.E.I.E. (France); served as the artist in residence at the Cyprus College of Art (Larnaca, Cyprus) and Taide & Design (Finland); and has been touted as the Leading Contemporary Photographer at the Fashion and Textile Museum (London). And then there are the celebrities who have relied on her skills to bring them to life in front of the lens, the likes of which include LMFAO, Amanda Lepore, Perez Hilton and the cast of NCIS.

Hannah has gained worldwide recognition for her photography, fashion being one of the key focuses of her work. She names House of Infinite Radness as her favorite Los Angeles-based designer, among other fashion influences. “In general, I love Martin Margiela, his work, but I also adore the mystique surrounding the identity of the designer. He has never been photographed, interviewed, and only replies to press via fax.”

After years spent immersed in Los Angeles and its fashion talents, calling medevacs for models and stumbling across creepy horror-film-like mannequins, Hannah now has her own advice to dispense to any future L.A. photographers:

“Don’t wait to be discovered; be proactive in finding work for yourself. Work for free to get ins, and then paid work will follow. Assist for photographers to learn their methods. The bottom line is that having a career in fashion photography requires primarily independent pursuit. If you’re driven, work hard and are persistent, it’s just a matter of building your book and paying your dues.”

Discover more of Hannah’s work in the slideshow below, while we also blow your mind with some additional Hannah Ross Q&A.

Q: What inspired you to be a photographer to begin with? Was it a specific photograph, or a specific photographer? How has that work or photographer influenced your work?

A: My uncle was a concert/band photographer, so growing up I was introduced to loads of gadgets and taught all sorts of film cameras. In middle school I started going to my community center to use the darkrooms, and by high school I had set up a darkroom in my bathroom. I always had seen it to be a very competitive and small industry (especially with the rise of new media) so I was initially discouraged from pursuing it as a viable career path. The only other work I sought out would have to be National Geographic. I didn’t have a subscription so I would buy the year prior at library sales, and as a kid I thought it would be the dream job to travel the world shooting photos.

Q: As a multimedia artist, what other media do you work with? And what excites you about other media?

A: I really work with anything that I can get my hands on. I research a great deal into new media sources and devices because technology has become so much more accessible and inexpensive. Experimentation is key to inspiring new methods of visuals. The new Lytro camera, for example, is a brand new technology where you can capture photographs in 3D, so in RAW conversion you can select which field is in focus. [It is] very exciting to be on the cusp of breaking new ground in the field.

Q: What is the most difficult aspect of being a photographer? On that note, what is your favorite aspect of this career?

A: The benefit of having inexpensive technology is obvious, but the downside is that the competition has now increased as well. It’s a tiny and tough field to stay active in and maintain ongoing clients. The upside is that the work I’m producing is creating imagery, which is immensely gratifying. I can’t imagine having another type of profession.

Q: Who is your favorite photographer?

A: Some of my favorites are Gregory Crewdson, Loretta Lux, Erwin Olaf and Gilbert Garcin.

Oh, Enough: Cameron Diaz is the Industry’s Newest Celeb-Turned-“Designer”

Photo Credit: Steve Eichner

Don’t get me wrong, I love Cameron Diaz and many of her fashion choices (particularly when she was a brunette). But her recent appointment as Pour La Victoire‘s artistic director is questionable. Hers is just another name on a growing list of celebrities who have been signed on to famous brands as some sort of director of creativity or artistry. Let’s not forget Rihanna’s disastrous collection for River Island, seemingly inspired by a passion for 90s midriffs. And, oh yeah, remember the time Lindsay Lohan declared an undying love for pasties in that Ungaro collection?

Designers spend years developing their talents in classes and ateliers, so why do we think it will be so easy for yet another celebrity with no actual design experience (and being sent free clothes or becoming besties with your stylist doesn’t count) to step into these roles so easily? I’m not asking to direct the next Spiderman—HELL NO would be the resounding answer—so it seems even more unreasonable for a fashion-happy celeb to suddenly shoot to the top of the industry’s very narrow ladder.

“I don’t do endorsements really. This is completely different,” Diaz told WWD in an exclusive interview. “Being influential in a brand and in its [advertising] campaigns interests me. I love fashion. It’s a large part of my life. What I wear is looked at. It influences what other people wear because that’s just the world we live in.”

Oh honey, I know, I love fashion too. That doesn’t mean I trust what you’re about to do. Not that it matters if Diaz is qualified; I’m not sure how much that factored in. I’m willing to bet a nice, juicy celebrity endorsement was the main motivator—but hey, I guess that’s just the world we live in.

Fashion Problems: The Trouble with Online Shopping

Photo Courtesy of Paris in the Midwest
This is what my Rachel Zoe skirt should look like. Photo Courtesy of Paris in the Midwest

Ugh, I just can’t shop online anymore. Don’t get me wrong, I love it. Love, love, love it. How many places can you get a Gucci watch for less than your entire paycheck (Thanks, Rue La La!)? Here’s the problem: Too many times I’ve anxiously anticipated my latest discovery to arrive, only to be disappointed when it was too small/too big/too different from the photo, and, as is usually the case with deal websites like Gilt and Ideeli, ruined with a smudge or small tear in a place I wasn’t supposed to notice.

Take, for example, the amazing Rachel Zoe skirt I splurged on last year for my birthday (Paris in the Midwest did a great blog post featuring this skirt). Originally $500, I paid a deeply (like, dig-to-the-center-of-the-earth deep) discounted price and felt like I had won the fashion lottery. So it was a double whammy when I finally tried it on and it a) was too small (really, Zoe? I ordered a size larger than I usually do, as was recommended. Stop being tiny.) and b) had a weird stain that is—even more weird—the color and pattern of the skirt. I can’t…I just don’t even know what that would be.

It seems like the solution is to just not shop at deal websites, but those aren’t the only let-downs I’ve had. My most recent order from Piperlime was, for the most part, successful. The only exception was this adorable floral top I ordered that turned out to look more 90s elementary school kid sporting a Lisa Frank binder than it was Kate Moss boho-chic.

I can think of worse things than being forced (the horror) to actually visit stores. “Shopping is my cardio.” Yes, Carrie, yes it is.